I've recently been considering the Industry-Academia divide more and more recently* in the context of technology research and technology businesses.
How can business fail to take on work done in academia, and how can academia fail to take on work done in business? Why are they such distinct creatures?
Prime examples:
- e-learning, where so much exciting work is being done by universities at the moment, especially in narrative and user-centred design. It seems to fail to reach the businesses which create e-learning environments however, thus leading to a feeling that nothing is being done in this area.
- In contrast so much work has been done in industry on things like TDD, pair-programming and agile methodologies that I find it shocking that the universities that teach it are few and far between. I've known cs undergraduate students finish degrees without having even heard of such things.
I've seen it argued that there is a divide between the goals and values of the two that make communication very difficult. Researchers value new knowledge ('that looks interesting') not new applications and generally don't work well in teams. A good business would rate business value ('that looks profitable') over risky innovation and exploration for exploration's sake, and values teamwork. Researcher's value dissemination, whereas a business would tend to value trade secrets.
I wonder if the base language of the two is just incompatible, or if it is a case of clashing world-views. Can people who work in industry generally appreciate talks given from a business perspective or vice-versa? I've been wondering this especially with the girl geek dinners, where academic talks could seem alien and not responsive to real-world issues but where business talks could leave out important research and background knowledge, depending on who is listening. To my mind the definition of 'someone who works, or has an interest in, technology' should embrace researchers in this field as core, but this does not seem to be so clearly the case.
I've become more and more sympathetic to the claims that more initiatives need to exist to bring the two sides together in collaboration, but I remain unsure as to whether they could ever fully understand each other. I also remain unsure whether this is a failure of universities to move with the times and acknowledge work done outside of their sheltered world, or whether it is the business view that work in academia is not necessarily valid work.
It just, well, seems such a waste.
----
* Presumably because I am an academic who is having a lot of contact with the Brighton new media community at present, rather than due to any exciting, or novel, trains of thought.