« Agile 2007 Experience | Main | CommecialiSE »

04/04/2007

Comments

Bruce Mason

Ah, I think this is a tricky issue and quite a slippery one to boot. One of the things I have been looking at - coming from a qual background myself - is tagging vs coding. At the moment web2.0 tagging is really a classificatory tool for units of content; more akin to categorising a whole interview (for example) rather than parts of it.

If one were to try to code this blog entry, tagging would be problematic because you're essentially looking at tagging "micro content". For example, one possible code might be "auto-generated content" (handy if you're doing some sort of actor-network analysis) or "who said what" types of codes (e.g. this comment might be coded as "comment" rather than blog entry and "Bruce Mason" in case I commented elsewhere).

Thing is, whenever I mention tagging to anyone in qual res, their first port of call is "ah, coding". In as much as tagging and coding are both instances of data mark-up then they're related but equating tagging with coding risks eliding some of the key differences.

That said, I'm still working some of this out and am likely to completely change my mind on a whim.

The comments to this entry are closed.

  •  

Connect

  •  

Translation

  • Eventyr <Adventure>
    Folkeeventyr <Folktales>